Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bird v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv09648
Plaintiff:
Rachel Bird
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams et al. v. Deva Concepts, LLC
as 1:2020cv09717
Defendant:
Deva Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Crystal Adams, Terrilyn Hunter, Kelly Rephann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Peter R. Tia v. FBI Office in Kapolei, HI et al
as 2:2019cv05306
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Salas, Tennessee Mafia Rachel Bird, FBI Office in Kapolei, HI and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Tia v. Honolulu Police Department, et al
as 18-15576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, DE CAIRES, Officer, WALMART and others
Peter Tia v. Honolulu Police Department, et al
as 18-15580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANS TAALA, Bishop of HCF Clergy, TENNESSEE FBI and others
Tia v. American Savings Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
American Savings Bank, Juliet Deyro, Kirsi Scotte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tia v. Honolulu Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Honolulu Police Dept., Hans Taala, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Honolulu Police Department (HPD) et al
as 1:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Honolulu Police Department (HPD), De Caires, Walmart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Abercrombie et al
as 2:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Peter Ray Tia
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Unknown Mock, Unknown Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Insurance Company of the West v. Bird Construction & Development, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10869
Plaintiff:
Insurance Company of the West
Defendant:
Bird Construction & Development, Inc., Brian Bird and Rachel Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
