Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Raul Castaneda, et al v. Gregory Hall, et al
as 23-3536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raul Rafael Castaneda and Martha M. Castaneda
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Luverne Hall, American Family Insurance, Darwin S. Williams and others
Castaneda et al v. Hall et al
as 0:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Raul Rafael Castaneda and Martha M. Castaneda
Defendant:
Gregory Luverne Hall, American Family Ins., Darwin S. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTANEDA MENDEZ v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAFAEL CASTANEDA MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castaneda-Acosta v. United States of America
as 7:2019cv00297
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rafael Castaneda-Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Castaneda v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv02822
Plaintiff:
Rafael Castaneda
Defendant:
Texas Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
USA v. Rafael Castaneda-Acosta
as 18-40184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL CASTANEDA-ACOSTA
United States of America v. Castaneda
as 3:2016cv50189
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rafael Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Castaneda v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02271
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rafael Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martinez et al v. Nash Finch Company
as 1:2011cv02092
Plaintiff:
Margaret Martinez , Maria Elena Castonon , Jorge Dominguez Ramirez and others
Defendant:
Nash Finch Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castaneda et al v. City of Clovis
as 1:2009cv00977
Defendant:
City of Clovis
Plaintiff:
Rafael Castaneda and Marla Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
