Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Ross v. Kelso et al
as 2:2014cv02533
Plaintiff:
Scott Ross
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Martinez, Zacharia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Kelso et al
as 3:2014cv04708
Plaintiff:
Scott Ross
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Martinez, Zacharia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01183
Defendant:
LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM P. ANGRICK , III, JAMES M. RALLO and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bulba v. Tunstall Holding, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00746
Defendant:
American Medical Alert Corporation, Richard Rallo and Tunstall Holding, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sergey Bulba, VLADISLAV FAYNBLUT, Arnaldo Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gao v. American Medical Alert Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv06245
Defendant:
American Medical Alert Corp., Richard Rallo and Tunstall Healthcare Group Limited
Plaintiff:
Xiang Wu Gao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Draper v. USDC-SAC
as 12-74045
:
In re: JOHN CLINT DRAPER
Petitioner:
JOHN CLINT DRAPER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
D. ROSAIRO, Officer, - FLOWERS, Sergeant, E. ROGERS, Lieutenant and others
Randy Geren v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY JAMES GEREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, J. WALKER, JOHN W. HAVILAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv14026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Potter et al
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Potter and Rallo's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
