Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cordero v. Ross Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv02009
Plaintiff:
Ramon Cordero
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Al-Rashid et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv11809
Plaintiff:
Barbara Al-Rashid, Daniel Bartow, Martin Benedek and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals America Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cordero-Ladner v. D12 et al
as 3:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramon Cordero-Ladner and Joey
Defendant:
Paul D. Rosengerg, Warren Mitch, Interscope Records and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. Antigua-Colon (Reyes)
as 20-2496
Defendant:
Ramon Cordero, Jorge Taveras-De Jesus, AKA Jorge Luis Rodriguez, AKA Jorge Francisco Fuentes-Rodriguez, AKA Angel Morales, AKA Luis Tevera, Rafael Garcia and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Reyes, AKA Roberto Camacho Figueroa, AKA Joselito, AKA Gordo
United States of America v. Antigua-Colon (Reyes)
as 20-2342
Defendant:
Ramon Cordero, Jorge Taveras-De Jesus, AKA Jorge Luis Rodriguez, AKA Jorge Francisco Fuentes-Rodriguez, AKA Angel Morales, AKA Luis Tevera, Rafael Garcia and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Reyes, AKA Roberto Camacho Figueroa, AKA Joselito, AKA Gordo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cordero-Orozco et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Demetrio Corrales-Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Corby Brown, Elliott Brown and Larry Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
