Cases 1 - 10 of 36
FLORES v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03750
Petitioner:
RAMON FLORES
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Juan Flores-Vivanco
as 21-40398
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Ramon Flores-Vivanco
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Lancaster Foods, LLC et al v. CIA Food Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv20952
Defendant:
Edilio Flores, Ramon Flores, CIA Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
G. Cepalu & Bro., Inc. and Lancaster Foods, LLC
Lancaster Foods, LLC et al v. CIA Food Corporation et al
as 1:2019mc20953
Defendant:
Edilio Flores, Ramon Flores, CIA Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
G. Cepalu & Bro., Inc. and Lancaster Foods, LLC
Flores, et al. vs. Aleksandrov, et al.
as 2:2018cv02356
Defendant:
Vladimir Aleksandrov and Triple D Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ramon Flores and Socorro Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores, et al. vs. Aleksandrov, et al.
as 3:2018cv00589
Defendant:
Vladimir Aleksandrov, Triple D Express, Inc. and Vladimir Naskov Aleksandrov
Plaintiff:
Ramon Flores and Socorro Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lancaster Foods, LLC et al v. CIA Food Corporation dba Food King Supermarket et al
as 1:2018cv02250
Plaintiff:
G. Cefalu & Bro., Inc. and Lancaster Foods, LLC
Defendant:
Ramon Flores, Edilio Flores, CALI Food Corporation dba Food King and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London v. DOE et al
as 1:2017cv08622
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Safety Check, Inc. and Ramon Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flores-Cordova v. USA
as 2:2016cv04389
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Ramon Flores-Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
