Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERR v. INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
ADAM KERR
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC., SATURN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., A TIMELY DELIVERY SERVICE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
OUMOUS v. MOROCAIN KINGDOM MILITARY et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
NOUREDDINE OUMOUS
Defendant:
MOROCAIN KINGDOM MILITARY and RAND CORPORATION AI TECHNOLEGY OF (THINK TANK)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. SHEEN et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
CLERK LYNDA SHEEN, REGISTER OF DEEDS ANN SHAW, SHERIFF LITCHARD HURLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Rand Manufacturing Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
Rand Manufacturing Inc. and Trusswood Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wright v. Edwards et al
as 5:2019ct03096
Defendant:
Ricky Bennett, Willis J. Fowler, Danielle Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Nicodemus Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Paul et al
as 5:2018ct03260
Defendant:
Rand Paul, Diane Black and Jeff Flake
Plaintiff:
Tryphon Dories Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rand v. USA
as 3:2017cv00687
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael T. Rand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
