Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Hughes
as 2:2024mc50185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall Hughes
Hughes v. USA
as 2:2023cv10571
Petitioner:
Randall Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Hughes
as 2:2022mc51562
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall Hughes
Interested Party:
Robert G. Close, Jr.
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52130
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74831
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Main Street Renewal, LLC v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv00334
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Ladeedra Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Randal Hughes and Main Street Renewal, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUGHES et al v. MAGNUM MIDSTREAM MANAGEMENT INC.
as 1:2017cv03802
Plaintiff:
ERIN BUCK, JOHN CARR, JEREMY GURETZKI and others
Defendant:
MAGNUM MIDSTREAM MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hughes et al v. Illinois Testing Services, et al.
as 3:2017mc00046
Plaintiff:
Randall Hughes , Anthony Tidwell , Erin Buck and others
Defendant:
Illinois Testing Services Incorporated and Glenn M. Hoiney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Hughes et al v. Illinois Testing Services Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01500
Plaintiff:
Randall Hughes , Anthony Tidwell , Erin Buck and others
Defendant:
Illinois Testing Services Incorporated and Glenn M Hoiney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Randall Hughes v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2017cv01343
Plaintiff:
Randall Hughes
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
