Cases
Enstrom et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Betsy Enstrom, John Stana, Kevin Arias-Watkins and others
Defendant: SAS Institute Inc., The Board of Directors of SAS Institute, Inc., The Retirement Committee of SAS Institute Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jones v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2020cv02010
Defendant: Jeffrey Masciangelo, Jeremiah Johnson, Marika Putnam and others
Plaintiff: Walter Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashid v. Washington Adventist Hospital et al
as 8:2014cv00909
Plaintiff: Muhammad Rashid
Defendant: Washington Adventist Hospital, Joyce Portella Newmyer, Randall Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wagner et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff: Randall Wagner , George A. Wagner, Jr. and Gerard J. Wagner
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MN Lawyers Mutual Ins Co v. Thomas Ahrens, et al
as 10-2779
Plaintiff - Appellee: MN LAWYERS MUTUAL INS CO
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS J. AHRENS, Esquire, AHRENS LAW FIRM, RANDALL WAGNER and others
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID E. RICKER
Type: Contract Insurance
MN Lawyers Mutual Ins Co v. Thomas Ahrens, et al
as 10-2780
Plaintiff - Appellee: MN LAWYERS MUTUAL INS CO
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS J. AHRENS, Esquire, AHRENS LAW FIRM and DAVID E. RICKER
Defendant - Appellant: RANDALL WAGNER
Type: Contract Insurance
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Ahrens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01661
Plaintiff: Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company and Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Thomas J. Ahrens, Ahrens Law Firm, P.C., David E. Ricker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?