Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BAROSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
RANDY ALEXANDER BAROSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16827
Plaintiff:
RANDI ALEXANDER and BARBARA KENNER
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00826
Plaintiff:
Randy Alexander Thomas
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Randi Alexander, et al v. Kathryn Falk, et al
as 19-16758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDI ALEXANDER and JACKSON YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHRYN FALK and ROMANTIC TIMES, INC., DBA Romantic Times Magazine
Defendant:
JANE DOE, AKA Gracie Wilson
Watterson v. Dixon
as 5:2019hc02241
Respondent:
FNU Dixon
Petitioner:
Randy Alexander Watterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watterson v. Auer
as 5:2019hc02214
Respondent:
Christopher Auer
Petitioner:
Randy Alexander Watterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randy Alexander v. Alan Potts, et al
as 19-2124
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW WICKMAN, CHARLES GULLEY, MARK PUTERBAUGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY ALEXANDER
Watterson v. Daniels
as 5:2019hc02167
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Petitioner:
Randy Alexander Watterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11061
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randy Alexander Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
