Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10826
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Graham, et al v. Nelson Peltz, et al
as 21-3975
Not Classified By Court:
In re: THE WENDY'S COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES GRAHAM, Derivatively on behalf of Wendy's Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS CARACCI, Derivatively on behalf of Wendy's Company
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON PELTZ, PETER W. MAY, EMIL J. BROLICK and others
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59714
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09563
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPHE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caracci v. Brolick et al
as 1:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Thomas Caracci
Defendant:
Emil J Brolick, Todd A. Penegor, Nelson Peltz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Graham v. Peltz et al
as 1:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
James Graham
Defendant:
Nelson Peltz, Peter W May, Emil J Brolick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03429
Plaintiff:
Darlene Lewis and Randolph Lewis
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Lewis
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Byrd
Defendant:
Neal Randolph Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis, Jr. v. Redman et al
as 1:2015cv01123
Plaintiff:
George Randolph Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Redman, Denise Snow and H. Lynn Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv24807
Plaintiff:
Monica Stuart and Randolph Lewis Stuart
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
