Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reish et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11651
Plaintiff:
George Reish, Thomas Schmotzer, Jeffrey Malin and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Arkema Inc, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sylvester et al v. City of New York
as 1:2025cv04365
Plaintiff:
Ervin Sylvester, Robert Ritz, Delano Dorsaint and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) FLSA: Minimum wage or overtime compensation
BELL v. MAYORKAS
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
SMITTY RANDY BELL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BELL v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2022cv23877
Plaintiff:
SMITTY RANDY BELL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO NICHOLAS MAYORKAS and DHS/FEMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Bell
as 6:2022cv03280
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Randy Bell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
BELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18181
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belle v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
Randy Belle
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Walid Ibrahim and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belle v. Nigro et al
as 1:2012cv02830
Plaintiff:
Randy Belle
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Police Officer Shawn Nigro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bryan Bell v. Rodney Danz, et al
as 08-35415
Debtor:
In the Matter of: BRYAN RANDY BELL
Appellant:
BRYAN RANDY BELL
Appellee:
RODNEY DANZ, JENNIFER DANZ, AURORA LOAN SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.