Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rao v. Bondi, et al.
as 1:2026cv03056
Plaintiff:
Vinod Chandrashekar Rao
Defendant:
Pamela Bondi, Sirce E. Owen, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Venkateswara Rao Addepalli v. Andrea R. Wood
as 26-2820
Petitioner:
VENKATESWARA RAO ADDEPALLI
Respondent:
ANDREA R. WOOD
Real Party In Interest:
INFOSYS LIMITED
Sampedro et al v. Bella Fiore Company, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01425
Plaintiff:
Claudia Sampedro, Eva Pepaj, Gallienne Nabila and others
Defendant:
The Bella Fiore Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Campos et al v. Ekpenyong Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2026cv13090
Plaintiff:
Alana Campos, Gallienne Nabila, Muriel Villera and others
Defendant:
Ekpenyong Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Garcia et al v. 1995 Holdings, Inc
as 2:2026cv13088
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ilene Garcia, Gallienne Nabila, Janet Guzman and others
Defendant:
1995 Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
