Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Raphael Clark v. State of Missouri
as 23-1561
Petitioner:
Raphael Clark
Respondent:
State of Missouri
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05793
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. 1,500 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00533
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
1,500 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, John H. Clark, Estate of Raphael Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Clark v. USA
as 4:2017cv01802
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raphael Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raphael Clark v. State of Missouri
as 14-1045
Petitioner:
Raphael Clark
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Ates et al v. St. Tammany Parish et al
as 2:2013cv05732
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ates, Todd Holmes and Raphael Clark
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish, St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Department , Rodney J Strain, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Missouri
as 4:2013cv00623
Petitioner:
Raphael Clark
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes et al v. St. Tammy Parish Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ates, Shambah M. Brown, Raphael Clark and others
Defendant:
St. Tammy Parish Sheriff's Department and Jack Strain, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raphael Clark v. Charles Lockett
as 11-3744
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAPHAEL CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT, Warden
CLARK vs MARBERRY
as 2:2011cv00133
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL CLARK
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
