Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RAHHAL v. META DIGITAL TRADE LTD et al
as 2:2023cv04371
Defendant:
ANA RAQUEL SANCHEZ, META DIGITAL TRADE LTD, ANA VANESSA and others
Plaintiff:
NASEEB RAHHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SANCHEZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17002
Plaintiff:
JOSEFINA SANCHEZ and THE ESTATE OF RAQUEL SANCHEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sanchez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03866
Plaintiff:
Raquel Sanchez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv15847
Plaintiff:
Raquel Sanchez and Noel Sanchez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32920
Plaintiff:
Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06284
Plaintiff:
Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc , Ethicon LLC and others
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv06284
Plaintiff:
Robin Anderson, Christy L Appleby, Christina Armentrout and others
Defendant:
Does, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
