Cases 1 - 10 of 237
(HC) Lopez-Cortez v. Salmonson
as 2:2023cv03007
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez-Cortez
Respondent:
S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lopez v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez-Pina v. Garland
as 22-1686
Petitioner:
RAUL LOPEZ-PINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Raul Lopez-Alvarez
as 23-55442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ-ALVAREZ
Lopez Estrada v. Department of Labor and Industries
as 3:2023cv05354
Plaintiff:
Christian Raul Lopez Estrada
Defendant:
Department of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PS)Lopez Estrada v. Department of Labor and Industries
as 2:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Christian Raul Lopez Estrada
Defendant:
Department of Labor and Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sequeira et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2022cv07996
Plaintiff:
Nelson Sequiera, Orsay Alegria, Ismael Cordero and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, The Western Union Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Najera v. Wesco Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Raul Lopez Najera
Defendant:
Wesco Insurance Company doing business as AmTrust North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
USA v. Raul Lopez-Valenzuela
as 21-50273
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA
Jose Pedroza et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv05012
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, Cecil Mangrum, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Pedroza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
