Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Headley et al
as 1:2023cv01218
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Officer Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Midland County Jail et al
as 7:2020cv00002
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Midland County Jail and Sheriff Gillette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2019cv00700
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Mrs. Thomas, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kenneth Parks, et al
as 18-10059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENNETH KIM PARKS, GREGORY BART MARTIN, MICHAEL RAY TAYLOR, Jr. and others
Movant - Appellant:
KYN K. NAOPE
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00652
Petitioner:
FRANKIE RAY TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
