Cases 1 - 10 of 850
Rayford v. Kimbro et al
as 2:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Willie Rayford
Defendant:
Gary Kimbro, Royal Lines, Inc. and Canal Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Stewart v. Rayford
as 4:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Rayford
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford v. Arnette
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Rayford
Defendant:
Damon Elroy Arnette, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Marshall Rayford et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARSHALL RAYFORD and DUPREE ANTOINE GLASS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CHRISTOPHER KEELING, STEVEN GROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Rayford et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Delvin Brown and Delvon Brown
Defendant:
C/O Rayford, Lt. Dallas, C/O Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Rayford Thompson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
