Cases 1 - 10 of 2,975
McIntosh v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 2:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Raymond McIntosh
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waller v. Phillips et al
as 4:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Sherman Waller
Defendant:
Mary Phillips, Raymond Fidel, Clay Scheitzach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heft v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HEFT
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC
Defendant:
James Dondero, Mark Okada, Mark Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Foggle v. Dallas Police Department
as 3:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Raymond D Foggle
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department and The City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hooper
as 24-30142
Petitioner:
Raymond Johnson
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Office v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Office
Defendant:
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cambric v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Cambric
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Tracey Cantu and Al Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDonald v. Kroger Texas L.P., d/b/a Kroger
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Raymond MacDonald
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P., d/b/a Kroger and Kroger Texas, L.P. d/b/a/ Kroger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
