Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $42,800.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
$42,800.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
RAYMOND LEWIS, SR. and RAYMOND LEWIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ray v. Treece et al
as 4:2016cv03292
Plaintiff:
Lewis Micheal Ray
Defendant:
Gerald Thomas Treece, Lillie A. Brown, Michael Attorney at Law Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Treece et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Defendant:
Lillie A. Brown, Raymond Lewis, Jr., Clauda Treece and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Micheal Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best Western International Incorporated v. Garrison Hotel PropCo LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02596
Plaintiff:
Best Western International Incorporated
Defendant:
Garrison Hotel PropCo LLC, Charleston Hotel OpCo LLC, Charleston Hotel PropCo LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Ernest Lewis, Jr.
as 10-2178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST RAYMOND LEWIS, JR.
Armando Coronado, et al v. Janice Brewer, et al
as 08-17567
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO CORONADO
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUBIO, MICHAEL GARZA, MICHELE CONVIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Governor, JANICE K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor, KEN BENNETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona and others
Amicus Curiae:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW
Coronado et al v. Napolitano, et al
as 2:2007cv01089
Plaintiff:
Armando Coronado, Armando Coronado, Armando Coronado and others
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Janice K Brewer, F Ann Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raymond Lewis, Jr.
as 2:2007cv01095
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
