Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rogers v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2022cv00613
Plaintiff: Raymond Rogers
Defendant: Board of Pardons and Parole and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00390
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00194
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 6:2020cv01196
Petitioner: Raymond Rogers
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Rogers et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00579
Plaintiff: Princeton T. Taylor
Defendant: Raymond Rogers, Curtis Pritchett, Lisa Turpid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rogers et al
as 2:2017cv01283
Plaintiff: Princeton T Taylor
Defendant: Raymond Rogers, Curtis Pritchett, Lisa Turpid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Raymond Surratt, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6851
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND ROGER SURRATT, JR.
Surratt v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00513
Petitioner: Raymond Roger Surratt, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Raymond Surratt, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6467
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND ROGER SURRATT, JR.
Bozeman v. Rogers (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00324
Plaintiff: Jimmie Bozeman
Defendant: Raymond Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?