Cases 21 - 30 of 49
MYERS v. READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2016cv03756
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 5:2016cv03291
Plaintiff:
MURICE O. PIERCE
Defendant:
READING HEALTH SYSTEM and READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Thomas Ochs, et al v. Reading Hospital
as 15-2728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS OCHS and LAURA OCHS, H/W
Defendant - Appellee:
READING HOSPITAL
Reading Hospital v. Anglepoint Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Reading Hospital
Defendant:
Anglepoint Group Inc and Microsoft Licensing GP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
READING HOSPITAL v. ANGLEPOINT GROUP, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv05955
Plaintiff:
READING HOSPITAL
Defendant:
ANGLEPOINT GROUP, INC. and MICROSOFT LICENSING, GP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
OCHS et al v. READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2014cv04017
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OCHS and LAURA OCHS
Defendant:
READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Queens County District Attorne
as 14-907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gilbert M. Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
Queens County District Attorney, (ADA Debra Pomodor), Kings County District Attorney, New York City Police Department, (Narcotics Division) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv05927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN v. THE READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 5:2013cv02113
Plaintiff:
SHARON BROWN
Defendant:
THE READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER , THE HIGHLANDS AT WYOMISSING , TRACEY AUNGST and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Martinez v. Queens County District Attorne
as 13-122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gilbert M. Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
Queens County District Attorney, ADA Debra Pomodor, Kings County District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
