Cases 41 - 50 of 65
One Barberry Real Estate Holding, LLC et al v. Maturo et al
as 3:2017cv00985
Defendant:
Mark Nimons, Michael Milici, Christopher Soto and others
Plaintiff:
Farm River Rock, LLC and One Barberry Real Estate Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv25290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv24719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Seedan Real Estate Holding, LLC v. Leary et al
as 3:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Seedan Real Estate Holding, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Leary, Robert Chisari and The Village of Waverly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORP Real Estate Holdings LLC et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
ORP Real Estate Holdings LLC and Oconomowoc Residential Programs Inc
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee and Thomas Mishefske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anald Lopez, et al v. Paterson Police, et al
as 15-3470
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANALD S. LOPEZ and ANTONIA LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PATERSON POLICE, CHIEF WILLIAM FRAHER, PARIS HENDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PO KEVIN KUNZIG and CHRISTOPHER RAVALESE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
