Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Ard v Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marlin Ard
Defendant:
Hilary D Boyd, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago Vazquez v. Martha Walters, et al
as 21-35759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANTIAGO VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTHA LEE WALTERS, Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court, THOMAS A. BALMER, CHRISTOPHER L. GARRETT and others
Vazquez v. Walters et al
as 3:2020cv01761
Defendant:
Hon Christopher L. Garrett, Hon Meagan A. Flynn, Hon Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan-Lee v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20900
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duncan-Lee
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01277
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duncan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:12-cv-00898
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duncan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology , Gynecare and others
Duncan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duncan
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renee Stephens v. State of Oregon, et al
as 11-35971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENEE STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Judicial Department, DONALD R. LETOURNEAU, Judge, RICK T. HASELTON, Judge and others
Stephens v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2011cv01013
Defendant:
Judge Rex Armstrong, Chief Justice Paul J. De Muniz, Judge Rebecca Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
