Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Linden v. St. Joseph, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Howard Linden and Howard T. Linden
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ST. JOSEPH, Sgt. Cody Back, Cpt. Kitty Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Restored Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Adam Edwards
Defendant:
Restored Holding, LLC, Credit-R-Us, Inc., Regan Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Muma v. Happy Smiles, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv10414
Plaintiff:
Sama Muma
Defendant:
Happy Smiles, LLC, Automation Alliance Group LLC, Nick Rafael Mocuta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis #158712 v. Regan et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Davis #158712
Defendant:
Jeff Johnson and Kym Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds #826576 v. Rewerts
as 1:2019cv00383
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Regan Adam Reynolds #826576
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Foerster et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lopez
Defendant:
Regan Foerster , Patrick Whiteford , Kalkaska, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yousssef v. Schuette et al
as 2:2017cv10610
Plaintiff:
Abdelbaset Abdelmagid Yousssef
Defendant:
Bill Schuette , Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) , Bureau of Professional Licensing and others
Guevara v. Summit Mortgage et al
as 2:2016cv14306
Plaintiff:
Regan Guevara
Defendant:
Summit Mortgage, Shenandoah Valley National Bank, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
