Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stokes et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2026cv01140
Plaintiff:
Regina Stokes and Ronnie Stokes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wareka v. GLOgeous by Regina LLC
as 4:2026cv01469
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
GLOgeous by Regina LLC doing business as Glogeous Aesthetics & Wellness
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stuart v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01264
Plaintiff:
Regina Stuart
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Christian Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 26-1801
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN HEALTHCARE CENTERS, INC.
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan, JOHN E. JOHNSON, JR., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Michigan Deptartment of Civil Rights, LUKE R. LONDO, in his official capacity as member of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Rivera et al
as 1:2026cv01693
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Defendant:
Jose Rivera and Phillip Boyajian
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
GOODE v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv06693
Plaintiff:
SHANTE REGINA GOODE
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
