Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Bickham
as 23-30105
Petitioner / Appellant: Reginald Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute, also known as Dusty Bickham
Brashear v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co et al
as 2:2022cv05930
Plaintiff: Charles Brashear
Defendant: Carolina Casualty Insurance Co, Tradition Transportation Co L L C and Reginald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. Bickham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01207
Defendant: Edward Bickham and Dusty Bickham
Plaintiff: Reginald Jones
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00522
Plaintiff: The Undersigned Prisoners and Reginald Jones
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abner et al v. Calumet G P L L C
as 5:2012cv00669
Plaintiff: Derrick Abner , Nathan Allen , Michael Ashby and others
Defendant: Calumet G P L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
King et al v. ABC Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2010cv04074
Plaintiff: George King and Reginald Jones
Defendant: ABC Manufacturing Company, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
In re: Reginald Jones
as 09-51
Petitioner: In re: REGINALD JONES
In Re: Jones
as 09-40015
Movant: In re: REGINALD JONES
Jones v. Texas Parole Board/Division
as 1:2007cv00676
Petitioner: Reginald Jones
Respondent: Texas Parole Board/Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hinds County, Mississippi
as 3:2007cv00289
Plaintiff: Reginald Jones
Defendant: Hinds County, Mississippi, Hinds County, Mississippi and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?