Cases 71 - 80 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halley v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
William Halley
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Thomas Stewart v. County of King, et al
as 17-35643
Appellant:
THOMAS SCOTT STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF KING, a home rule charter county
Defendant:
PORT OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC and CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest v. Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority et al
as 4:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest
Defendant:
Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority and David Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salyer et al v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Defendant:
Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority and Mark Donaghy
Plaintiff:
Local 1385 Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO and Glenn Salyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
