Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bors v. Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma
as 5:2018cv01235
Defendant:
Board of Regents for the Regional University System of Oklahoma and University of Central Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Veronica Tyler Bors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Subpoena of Feleshia Porter
as 3:2016mc00067
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Rachel Jona Tudor
Defendant:
Regional University System of Oklahoma and Southeastern Oklahoma State University
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Madden v. Regional University System, et al
as 15-6008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID P. MADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONAL UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA, a State of Oklahoma constitutionally created governing board, NOTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY, a public university, CARI KELLER, in her individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
