Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Engeo Incorporated v. CR Aerial, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Cody Remington and CR Aerial, LLC
Plaintiff:
Engeo Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Conair Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv03317
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Conair Corporation, Leucadia National Corporation, HRG Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis Burden et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burden , Patricio Burillo , John Chapman and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Volkswagen A.G., Audi AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis Burden et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09125
Defendant:
Audi AG, Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burden, Patricio Burillo, John Chapman and others
Moodie et al v. Remington Arms Company, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
William G. Moodie and James W. Waterman
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company, LLC., Sporting Goods Properties, Inc. and E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
HENDERSON v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
DAVID C HENDERSON
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY LLC and CASCADE CARTRIDGE INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Henderson v. Remington Arms Company, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
David C Henderson
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company LLC and Cascade Cartridge Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
MAXWELL v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
RONNIE MAXWELL
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rodgers v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
David Russell Rodgers
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
