Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00732
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Bristol Regional Women's Cente, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6267
Plaintiff / Appellee: KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, formerly known as Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY and others
Defendant: DR. RENEE SAUNDERS and WILLIAM BYRON LEE
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General of Tennessee and others
Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00740
Plaintiff: FemHealth USA, Inc., Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi and others
Defendant: Rene Saunders, Glenn Funk, Tom P. Thompson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Memphis Ctr for Repro Health, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5969
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, on behalf of herself and her patients and others
Defendant / Appellant: LISA PIERCEY, M.D., Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health, in her official capacity, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Davidson County, Tennessee, in his official capacity, CHARME P. ALLEN, District Attorney General of Knox County, Tennessee, in her official capacity and others
Saunders v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv12210
Plaintiff: Tawni Renee Saunders
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Memphis Center for Reproductive Health et al v. Slatery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00501
Plaintiff: FemHealth USA, Inc., Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Dr. Kimberly Looney and others
Defendant: Rene Saunders, Honorable Amy P. Weirich, Glenn Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5408
Plaintiff / Appellee: ADAMS & BOYLE, P.C., on behalf of itself and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION and others
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, ETHICS AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION and others
Ingram v. Tennessee Department of Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01565
Plaintiff: Alton Earl Ingram, Jr.
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Health, Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners, Andrea Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Lattimore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv03204
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant: Rudel D Lattimore, Rumors, LLC, Rumors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davall et al v. Gulfstream Coach Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00217
Plaintiff: Helen Davall , James Dukes , Mary Giles and others
Defendant: Gulfstream Coach Incorporated, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?