Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Black Diamond Developers, LP et al v. Homeowners' Association of Cimarron, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Black Diamond Developers, LP and CCC Operations, LLC
Defendant:
Homeowners' Association of Cimarron, Inc., Planning Department of The City of Mission, Joseph Felton Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ricardo Duran
as 17-13320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO LEE DURAN
McGlothlin v. State of Iowa
as 4:2015cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Lee McGlothlin
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricardo Aguilar v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 13-36031
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO LEE AGUILAR
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Ricardo Aguilar v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 13-35808
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO LEE AGUILAR
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Ward et al v. Poole's Cable Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Greg Ward , Craig Ward , Ricardo Lee and others
Defendant:
Poole's Cable Services, Inc. and Charles R. Poole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aguilar v. Utecht
as 2:2012cv05172
Petitioner:
Ricardo Lee Aguilar
Respondent:
Jeffrey Utecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salinas v. Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD. et al
as 7:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lee Salinas
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD. and Wayne Folmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Aguilar v. Uttecht
as 2:2012cv05127
Petitioner:
Ricardo Lee Aguilar
Respondent:
Jeff Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aguilar v. Robertson et al
as 3:2009cv05532
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lee Aguilar
Defendant:
Eric Robertson, Doug Waddington and Ed Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
