Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Martinez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Ricardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murray v. Booker et al
as 7:2019cv00427
Plaintiff:
Ronald D'Wayne Murray
Defendant:
Dr. Ricardo Martinez, Nurse Allison Hunter, Dr. William York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04366
Plaintiff:
Patricia K. Martinez and Ricardo Martinez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Ricardo Elvin Martinez
as 11-4607
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO ELVIN MARTINEZ, a/k/a Ricardo Martinez-Selvin, a/k/a Ricardo Martinez-Servin, a/k/a Jose Lopez Diaz
Anderson v. Martinez
as 7:2009cv00330
Petitioner:
Antinne Anderson
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Martinez
as 2:2009cv00288
Petitioner:
Antinne Anderson
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Martinez
as 7:2009cv00234
Petitioner:
Antinne Anderson
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
Ethan J. Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Receiver:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
