Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Richard Ball
as 23-3461
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Thomas Ball
Hamner v. Straughn et al
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Charles Straughn, Richard Todd Ball, Natasha Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corriher v. Richland Diversified Industries, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Theodore H. Corriher
Defendant:
Richland Diversified Industries, Inc., All Family Craft, Inc., Charger Deck Boat, Inc. and others
Jay Harris v. Richard Ball, et al
as 23-2388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
Deputy Warden Richard Todd Ball, Ouachita River Unit of the Arkansas Division of Correction, Director Dexter Payne, ADC, Dr. Guy Michael Henry, ORU and others
Brewer v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03045
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brewer
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, John M. Godfrey, Richard D. Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06011
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Crow
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06157
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne, Dr. Guy M. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06118
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne and Dr. Guy M. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
