Cases 1 - 10 of 62
MEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10461
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ANDREW MEYER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. Harrison County Adult Center
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Richard Dale Meyers
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92794
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MEYER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66700
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A MEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50457
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MEYER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20557
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A MEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer v. Baquet et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Richard E Meyer
Defendant:
Marlene C Baquet and Steven Baquet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nero et al v. Baquet et al
as 4:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Chris M Nero and Maria Bullock Nero
Defendant:
Marlene Baquet, Stephen Baquet, Richard E Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Meyers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Meyers
Defendant:
Ramirez, Wessels, Overguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
