Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Abukar Abdulle, et al v. Robert Sillen, et al
as 22-15319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABUKAR ABDULLE, RUBEN ARECHIGA, GARLAND BAKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT SILLEN, Former Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services and JOHN CLARK KELSO, Receiver for The California Prison Systems Medical Care, Head of California Correctional Health Care Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv07065
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. BURKE et al
as 3:2018cv13041
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Richard Burke, The Warren County Prosecutor's Office, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv08594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sandifer v. Burks et al
as 1:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Lance Thomas Sandifer
Defendant:
Richard Burks, Sean Brantley, Ben Killingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
