Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CHATMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08033
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHATMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAVANAH et al v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
PERRY B CAVANAH, STEVEN L EADS, LEWIS M CLARK and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF RICHARD CHATMAN, CAPTAIN BUSTER KING, LEUTINENT ENRIQUE MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Paul Chatman
as 17-4288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL RICHARD CHATMAN, a/k/a Paul Richard Chapman
BROOKS v. WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID BROOKS
Defendant:
WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA , RICHARD CHATMAN , THOMAS KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albus et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Albus , Grace Reid , Lee Morris and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chatman et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07076
Plaintiff:
Richard Chatman, Richard Chatman, Richard Chatman and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Chatman
as 5:2008cv00389
Plaintiff:
Isreal Walker
Defendant:
Richard Chatman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shinholster v. Chatman et al
as 5:2008cv00403
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Shinholster
Defendant:
Richard Chatman and Wesley Nunn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Chatman et al
as 5:2008cv00402
Plaintiff:
Isreal Walker
Defendant:
Richard Chatman and Wesley Nunn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Chatman et al
as 5:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
Derrick B Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Chatman and Wesley Nunn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
