Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Washington v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Bruce Washington
Defendant:
Sheriff Randy Smith, Chance Cloud, Curtis Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmisano v. USA
as 1:2016cv00308
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Palmisano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harper v. Covington City et al
as 2:2014cv02138
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Harper
Defendant:
Richard Palmisano , Mike Cooper , Steven Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp et al v. Covington Police Chief Richard Palmisano et al
as 2:2013cv05429
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sharp, III , Lysett Rene Lerma , Danielle Lerma and others
Defendant:
Richard Palmisano , Covington City , Covington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp et al v. Covington Police Chief Richard Palmisano et al
as 3:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sharp, Lysett Rene Lerma, Danielle Lerma and others
Defendant:
Covington Police Chief Richard Palmisano, City of Covington, Louisiana, City of Covington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kentzel v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2012cv01626
Defendant:
City of Covington , Richard Palmisano , Bradley Eckert and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kentzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Covington City et al
as 2:2012cv01514
Plaintiff:
James A Walker
Defendant:
Covington City, Richard Palmisano and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayberry v. Covington City et al
as 2:2012cv00611
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mayberry
Defendant:
Covington City, Covington City Police Department, Richard Palmisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breazeale v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Lucas Bart Breazeale
Defendant:
Eric Driscoll, William Manning, Stephen Culotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
