Cases 21 - 30 of 44
PATTON v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00596
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PATTON
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv08009
Petitioner:
Richard Patton, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patton v. Meko
as 7:2017cv00423
Petitioner:
Richard Patton, Jr
Respondent:
Joseph Meko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patton v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv08006
Petitioner:
Richard Patton, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Boese v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B et al
as 4:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Robert Boese
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, F.S.B , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) , Richard Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flanary et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Flanary, Jr. and Gena L. Flanary
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A. , Deac Caufield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Family Mutual Ins. v. John Martin Donaldson
as 15-1465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellant:
John Martin Donaldson
Defendant:
Todd Richard Patton and Jacob Todd Patton
Patton v. United States of America
as 7:2015cv08001
Petitioner:
Richard Patton, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cathey v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv01036
Petitioner:
William Reeves Cathey
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mindy Cunningham, Richard Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
