Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Doe et al v. Salisbury University et al
as 1:2015cv00517
Defendant:
Salisbury University, Valerie Randall-Lee, Helena Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Doe, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al
as 1:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilcoxson
Defendant:
Buncombe County, Bobby Medford, Sam Constance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Smeltzer et al
as 6:2013cv01613
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robert Smeltzer, Richard Roe, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Norman v. Osbourne et al
as 8:2013cv01242
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Steave Osbourne , Officer Nichols , Nick Futch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Graham v. Murray et al
as 8:2012cv03561
Plaintiff:
Onjela Mildred Graham
Defendant:
John Long, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forbes v. Dawsey et al
as 4:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Forbes
Defendant:
Martin C Dawsey, Bellamy Law Firm, The, R Michael Munden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost v. Young et al
as 5:2011ct03273
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaye Frost
Defendant:
J. P. Young, Arthur F Beeler, BOP Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Young et al
as 5:2011cv00761
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaye Frost
Defendant:
J. P. Young, Arthur F Beeler, BOP Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2011cv00760
Defendant:
J P Young, Arthur F Beeler, BOP Officer Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. McCray et al
as 4:2011cv01305
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sam J McCray, Gilbert McCray, Elsie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
