Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Cook et al v. Riley et al
as 3:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dale F Cook and Tammy L Cook
Defendant:
Brad Riley, Jason Thomas, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemon v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv02758
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Lemon, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, City of Sumter Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Cannon
as 2:2010cv02236
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bowie Robinson
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Smeltzer et al
as 6:2010cv02032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robert Smeltzer, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman v. Frederick et al
as 8:2009cv02479
Plaintiff:
Rahmad N Norman
Defendant:
Michael Frederick, Dale Kittles, Christopher Hamlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael D'Alessandro v. The County of Montgomery
as 09-7707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RICHARD D'ALESSANDRO
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN DOE, Sheriff's Officer and others
D'Alessandro v. The County of Montgomery et al
as 8:2008cv02841
Plaintiff:
Michael R. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
The County of Montgomery , Montgomery County Sheriff, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Alessandro v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael R. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland, Montgomery County Sheriff, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hook v. Walmart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2008cv03005
Plaintiff:
G Brock Hook
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc, John Doe, Walmart Stores East LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
