Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jeffries v. Hudson
as 6:2026cv02452
Plaintiff:
Rickel Marquavius Dani Jeffries
Defendant:
James E Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jeffries v. Bodiford
as 8:2026cv01832
Petitioner:
Rickel Marquavius Dani Jeffries and Rickel Marquavius Dani Jefferies
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
United States v. Colton Rickels
as 26-1434
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Colton Rickels
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jefferies v. Cheatham
as 6:2025cv13858
Plaintiff:
Rickel Marquavius Dani Jefferies
Defendant:
Cedric D Cheatham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rickel Jeffries v. General Assembly of S.C.
as 25-7008
Plaintiff:
RICKEL MARQUAVIUS D. JEFFRIES
Defendant:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General, JOE KERNELL and others
Burlington Insurance Company, The v. Easterling et al
as 4:2025cv13553
Defendant:
Alma Easterling doing business as Jayannas #1 also known as The Spot, The Spot, Jayannas #1 doing business as The Spot and others
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company, The
Counter-Claimant:
Laquan Pouncy and Deionte Cain
Counter-Defendant:
Burlington Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Quin Rickel v. Dept. USAF
as 25-2349
Plaintiff:
QUIN ADAM RICKEL and AMY ELIZABETH RICKEL
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW and others
Mathews v. Roblox Corporation
as 3:2025cv08833
Plaintiff:
Rickell Mathews
Defendant:
Roblox Corporation
Petitioner:
Thomas K. Litton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
