Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Selvin Carranza, et al v. Janine K. Jeffery, et al
as 23-55180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SELVIN ORLANDO CARRANZA
Appellant:
JANINE K. JEFFERY
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SUGLICH, Chairperson Chief Deputy Warden (A) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), ALAN HERNANDEZ, Associate Warden (AW) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), EDWARD GARCIA, CCPOA Representative/Correctional Captain at RJ Donovan and others
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary for CDCR, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary for CDCR and others
Davis v. Davis
as 4:2018cv00969
Petitioner:
Rickey Davis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. DAVIS
as 4:2018cv04242
Petitioner:
Rickey Davis
Respondent:
LORIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00798
Petitioner:
Rickey Davis
Respondent:
Jeffery Landry and Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Davis v. DeLane Butler, et al
as 14-60856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DELANE BUTLER, CHARLES JOHNSON, RONALD STRICKLAND and others
Davis v. Epps et al
as 2:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and J. Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Bender et al
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Bender, Unknown Byrd, J. Buscher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Butler et al
as 2:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis
Defendant:
DeLane Butler, Charles Johnson, Ronald Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. McCoy
as 4:2012cv01092
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Thames
as 2:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis
Defendant:
Joel Thames, Willie Wallace, Sandra Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
