Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Riddick v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jerome Riddick
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poteat v. Hartford Housing et al
as 3:2021cv01432
Plaintiff:
Kennara Poteat
Defendant:
Hartford Housing, Enfield Housing, CHRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merholz et al v. McMahon et al
as 3:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, ManJit Singh, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jimenez and Ryan B. Merholz
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Nordstrom v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00904
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nordstrom
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Interested Party:
Melvyn Klein and Ryan Merholz
Kooi v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00743
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kooi
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Interested Party:
Ryan Merholz and Melvyn Klein
Merholz et al v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00557
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Laureen Ong and others
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein and Ryan Merholz
Rogers v. Correction et al
as 3:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama, Department of Correction, Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. McMahon et al
as 3:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Querino Maia, Rivera, City of Waterbury and others
Plaintiff:
Jewu Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Burns et al
as 3:2019cv00177
Defendant:
William Mulligan, Craig Burns, Nick Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
