Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cacaccio v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06916
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan N.V. and Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cacaccio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cacaccio v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06916
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan N.V. and Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cacaccio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2018cv02135
Plaintiff:
Kaley Diann Silva and Lindsey Avenetti
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teah Lynn v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 2:2018cv08761
Plaintiff:
Teah Lynn
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 3:2018cv00305
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kaley Diann Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Skagit County et al v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2018op45173
Defendant:
The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Skagit County, City of Sedro Woolley, City of Mount Vernon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GROSS v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 1:2013cv06627
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. GROSS
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rite Aid Corporation v. Hussman Corporation
as 7:2011cv08816
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Corporation
Defendant:
Hussman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 2:2011cv03510
Plaintiff:
Judy Nichols
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01933
Plaintiff:
Arthur Green and Arthur Green
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Caremark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
