Cases 41 - 50 of 4,224
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Escamilla v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), State of California, CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miguel Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsuma v. Connecticut Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Emile I. Tsuma, Sr.
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Correction, Bridgeport Correctional Center, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. RIVERA
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CORPORAL ANDREW ROSAIO, OFFICER JOSEPH MIHALYI and others
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
LUIS M RIVERA
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, COLLETTE PETERS, JACK CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Rivera v. State of Florida
as 24-10477
Petitioner:
SAMUEL RIVERA, a.k.a Tony El Enfermo
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Rivera v. U.S District Court
as 1:2024cv10268
Petitioner:
Benito Rivera
Respondent:
U.S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
