Cases 1 - 10 of 763
Hill v. State
as 4:2024cv02887
Petitioner:
Bruce A. Hill and Bruce Antwain Hill
Respondent:
State and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jordan v. Fort Worth Medical Center et al
as 3:2024cv00750
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
Fort Worth Medical Center, P Velda Bellah, Jeremy Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 9:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Sr. Lawrence L Jackson
Respondent:
Illinois River Correctional Center and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tervin Goodman v. Warden of Broad River CI
as 24-6149
Petitioner:
TERVIN GOODMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Gene Cooper, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6107
Petitioner:
GENE TONY COOPER, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Bishop v. Fort Belknap Tribe et al
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Kolton Bishop
Respondent:
Fort Belknap Tribe and Two Rivers Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
