Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Christopher Dolin v. Jordan Kindred
as 19-2159
Defendant / Appellee:
JORDAN KINDRED, Officer, Riverside Regional Jail Authority
Defendant:
JEFFERY NEWTON, Colonel, Retired Supertinentdent, Riverside Regional Jail Authority, WALTER J. MINTON, Major, Deputy Superintendent, Riverside Regional Jail Authority and KAREN CRAIG, Acting Supertinendent, Riverside Regional Jail Authority
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DOLIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Dolin v. Lieutenant Jones
as 19-2078
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN CRAIG, Superintendent, RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and LIEUTENANT JONES, OPR Lieutenant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DOLIN
Christopher Dolin v. Dawn Flippin
as 19-2071
Defendant / Appellee:
D. FLIPPIN, Major, Riverside Regional Jail
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DOLIN
Dolin v. Kindred et al
as 5:2019cv00433
Defendant:
Charlene Jones, Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Corizon Health and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolin v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00538
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Lieutenant Jones and Karen Craig
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Nurse Williams, Hicks-van-Haren and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail and Ms. Dolin
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Riverside Regional Jail
as 1:2018cv01610
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Brooks
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newby v. Riverside Regional Jail
as 3:2018cv00837
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
