Cases 21 - 30 of 2,044
Crispin v. Roach
as 24-460
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Defendant:
ROACH, Correctional Officer, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity, ERIC, Nurse, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity and others
Breed v. Griffin et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Charles Gregory Breed
Defendant:
Janis Bates Griffin and Patrick Joseph Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Benshoof, et al. v. Brier, et al.
as 24-952
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF and BRIANA GAGE
Defendant:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Breed v. Bates Griffin et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Charles Gregory Breed
Defendant:
Janis Bates Griffin and Patrick Joseph Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Byfield v. New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE)
as 24-219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN S. BYFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, (NYC DOE)
Defendant:
DISTRICT COUNCIL 37, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, LIZ VLADECK and others
ROACH v. EMMONS
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
EARL ROACH
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROACH v. HEALTHEC, LLC
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
TRUNETTA ROACH
Defendant:
HEALTHEC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
