Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Elliott v. Jeffreys
as 4:2026cv03221
Plaintiff:
Adam Elliott
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominick v. Gordon et al
as 3:2026cv07654
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Jr. Dominick
Defendant:
Steve Gordon, Sean Duryee and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Jeffreys
as 4:2026cv03222
Plaintiff:
Adam Elliott
Defendant:
Director of NDCS Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lind v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07622
Plaintiff:
Rob Lind
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Reid (Trent)
as 26-1998
Defendant:
DESHAWN THOMAS, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Old River Investments OZ Holding, LLC v. Fortney et al.
as 1:2026cv01708
Plaintiff:
Old River Investments OZ Holding, LLC
Defendant:
John Fortney, Rob McColley, Matt Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adame, et al. v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
as 26-4553
Respondent:
MYRNA ADAME, SIDNEY AGUILAR, JASON ALBERT and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY
Jackson-Edney, et al. v. Labrador, et al.
as 26-4551
Plaintiff:
EMILIE JACKSON-EDNEY, DANIEL DOE, DIEGO FABLE and others
Defendant:
RAUL LABRADOR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho, JAN M BENNETTS, In her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Ada County, PETER DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Adams County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
