Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,597
WRIGHT v. FITZPATRICK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner: Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent: US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Randall
Defendant: Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Childress v. USA
as 3:2024cv00815
Petitioner: Robert Lee Childress, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Finley v. Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
as 2:2024cv00840
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Finley
Defendant: Stephanie, Well Path Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robert Foster v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6414
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, MEDICAL BRANCH and LARRY POWELL, Director of Spartanburg County Jail
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jenkins v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-2736
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE JENKINS
Defendant: T.L. CAMPBELL, Warden, L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer and Z. MADDEN, Correctional Officer
Howard v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Robert Lee Howard
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Robert Pringle
as 24-11268
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROBERT LEE PRINGLE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?